oficina / suite Public

Two corrections the amendments found, and where each app half landed

Applying Appendix A to the four app specs turned up two defects in the
appendix itself.

A.1 said "add ruling 22" to the home spec. The home already has a ruling 22
— team selection is navigation state — so the number was taken before it was
ever used. GPT-6's review of revision 3 flagged the risk; checking the home
spec confirmed it. It landed as ruling 23.

The memoria citations are worse than a number. Decisions 13 and 14, gate 26
and §8.4 resolve only in memoria's unmerged tensorx-provider worktree at
8dfc3c9, not on its main at 5869e73 — so this document cites text that is
not where it says it is. Recorded as open in §14 and asked at
oficina/memoria discussion 1, with the ask that memoria say which baseline
is real. Either the citations move to the commit that carries them or the
claims come out. Nothing else in the doctrine depends on them.

Where §12 step 1 stands. Docs, Sheets and the home each have a
`suite-amendment` branch, pushed and described; A.2 also closes
oficina/docs discussion 33. memoria is a request rather than a branch,
because that repo has three locked worktrees and two of A.4's sections are
ones those sessions are plausibly editing. A.5 waits for calendar's first
screens, as the appendix already says.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>