oficina / meet Public

Clone
git clone https://amadan.net/oficina/meet

Plain git — no account needed to clone.

Download

Download this file

Meet slice 6 — the record

Branch slice/6-deploy, 9225ec2..HEAD (this commit; started on main 9225ec2, tag v0.1.0). Spec: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-07-meet-design.md, revision 9 (§15.18 carries this slice's dispositions). Plan: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-09-14-meet-slice-6-deploy.md.

Slice 6 is the programme's closing slice (spec §12 item 6) and is documentation only: README.md, PRODUCT.md, a Deploying section in AGENTS.md, the Consumed suite rulings commit (fa875c7, the hash suite Appendix A.6 points at) and the spec amendments that commit and the review made. No file under internal/, cmd/, native/, callscore/ or protocol/ changed. The ledger is .superpowers/sdd/2026-09-14-meet-slice-6-deploy/ (gitignored; this file is its substance).

---

1. Rulings and decisions

  • The slice was re-scoped against main as it is on 2026-09-14, not as the programme imagined it on 2026-09-09. Between slice 5 (a283c53, 2026-09-11) and this slice, other sessions landed Home sign-in (§7.1.1), the shared Estilo day theme and brand, the invitation Share route (the 2026-09-12 amendment), and the native Mac, iPhone and iPad apps. The plan's "What slice 6 was, and what it is now" table is the disposition of each programme item; §12 item 6 and §15.18 restate it in the spec.
  • The acknowledgements page is not built here. oficina/meet discussion 10, branch feat-open-source-credits (117b6e4, bbc126e), carries a shared Estilo credits page with a runtime dependency inventory and its freshness gate, Fable-approved and verified live on the overnight canary. Building a second one would be the duplication the programme forbids.
  • The Estilo theme pin. The programme's condition was a tagged release; git ls-remote --tags on oficina/estilo is empty on 2026-09-14. The theme is nevertheless adopted on main at an indirect pseudo-version (go.mod), brought in by the Home integration. Recorded as: condition unmet, adoption done by another route, nothing changed here.
  • No deploy from this slice. The change is documentation, checkable from this diff. As observed on 2026-09-14 from carlos channels and oficina/meet discussions 11 and 14, edge (calls.oficina.works) was being promoted by hand by Paul (651cff2 on 2026-09-12), with discussion 14's web UI work queued behind a live check — state as of that observation, not asserted as current here. A redeploy would drop live calls for nothing; a queued promotion is never announced as live (programme §5). The domain was attached before this slice.
  • Copy review is waived for this round by Paul's steering on oficina/suite discussion 5. README and PRODUCT.md prose is catalogued here (§3) rather than reviewed.
  • Writers did not commit. Three writers worked concurrently in one worktree on disjoint files; the controller committed each set. The index is the shared resource, not the files.
  • Every behavioural claim is verified against the code on the branch and cites its source. The whole-branch review's finding was that the writers verified the documents against the code but not the code's documents against the documents: four spec sentences on main asserted things about "the README" that the README, once it existed, did not say (§0.1/§5.6's encryption sentence, §5.5's TCP-443 cause and "first paragraph", §3.2's residue). All four now hold, and the fix wave swept every spec sentence naming README, AGENTS.md or PRODUCT.md (twelve remaining, all true).
  • The two meanings of "floor". §5.5's floor is "no relay"; §9's is the scriptless floor. §12 item 6 now says which goes where (the scriptless sentence in the README's first paragraph, the relay paragraph carrying §5.5's sentence second); §15.18 notes the two senses.
  • Platform facts stated from this project's own deploys, not from the platform source: carlos canary composed a host the console refused (platform discussion 124, open); the recipe used is carlos instances create --host <name>-meet.bds.oncarlos.com --channel canary/<name> --environment <name> then carlos deploy --channel …, with the environment bundle mandatory because a canary without one serves CALLS_ORIGIN for the main host and refuses sign-in while GETs look healthy. The release command is carlos deploy --app meet --account oficina --channel edge --version <sha> --target linux-arm64 releases/meet-linux-arm64 after make release VERSION=<sha>; the deploy wait can time out before the hand-over while the instance serves the new version a minute later.
  • Ruling 16 stays cited as on the doctrine's worktree-worktree-token-at-rest branch, not doctrine main (whose rulings run 1 to 15 at 1ac4323, revision 8, confirmed current by ls-remote on 2026-09-14), as amended by the 2026-09-12 sharing update for invitation tokens; agent credentials remain hash-only and shown once.

---

2. Per-task review dispositions

Three writing tasks (Sonnet) in parallel, then one whole-branch review (Opus) and one fix wave, then Codex rounds.

  • Task 1, README and AGENTS.md (93f1c2e): 106 lines, the two paragraphs first. Flagged and acted on: spec §11 still listed a native client as not built (aa9b227). Flagged and initially left, then closed by the review: §5.5's "first paragraph" cross-reference; CALLS_SMTP_PASS as a secret.
  • Task 2, PRODUCT.md (e684b97): impeccable product schema 1 in oficina/docs' shape with the unattended-writing disclaimer; "What is deliberately not here" carries the scriptless exception spec §9 asked for.
  • Task 3, the consumed-rulings commit (fa875c7): §0.2's 4/12 row consumes the home's assertions through §7.1.1 with the allowlist as membership authority; a ruling-16 row as amended; §12 item 6 annotated; §15.18 added. Revision line left at 9, following what §15.13 to §15.17 did.
  • Whole-branch review (e684b97): verdict merge with named fixes, W6-1 to W6-15, all applied in bf3b86b and c22cae7 (reflow), plus the handoff's spec sweep, the two-floors disambiguation, §15.11's stale "until slice 3, or until a drain exists" (no drain exists; every deploy drops live calls) and token_sealed added to §2.1's meeting_links columns. Roughly sixty behavioural claims were traced to file and line and found correct; the fifteen findings were the remainder.

Codex round 1 (independent, static, scope 9225ec2..c22cae7): verdict request changes — thirteen findings, S6-1 through S6-13. All applied in one commit (.superpowers/sdd/2026-09-14-meet-slice-6-deploy/fix-wave-report.md, round-1 section):

  • S6-1 — P2, deployment settings undocumented. Fixed: README's Deploying section enumerates every required setting and which refuse startup outside -env development.
  • S6-2 — P2, the deploy-wait guarantee had an unstated prerequisite. Fixed: README and AGENTS.md now state the carlos apps build-probe prerequisite and the X-Carlos-Version fallback it stands in for.
  • S6-3 — P2, the scriptless exception was narrower than shipped. Fixed, then completed in Codex round 2 (S6-16): README, PRODUCT.md and spec §9 name the chat panel and the live admission controls as script-gated too, alongside browser media participation; AGENTS.md's two matching lines, left behind in round 1, were widened the same way, so §9's "the binding file and the code agree" holds again; §15.18 notes both.
  • S6-4 — P2, the cgo claims didn't match the Makefile. Fixed, then corrected again in Codex round 2 (S6-14): README and PRODUCT.md say CGO_ENABLED=0 make ci and name make race and make native-test's callscore sub-step as the two CGO_ENABLED=1 cases that never ship; the native Mac and iPhone/iPad apps are named separately as the one place real cgo does ship (MeetBridge, linked by MeetKit), while server releases stay cgo-free.
  • S6-5 — P2, the SMTP fallback description was backwards. Fixed: README now says the platform supplies CARLOS_SMTP_FROM too, which CALLS_SMTP_FROM optionally overrides.
  • S6-6 — P2, suite restatements remained under §0.2. Fixed, then completed in Codex round 2 (S6-15): rows 3, 6, 9 and 15 cite section and ruling number only; the discussion-4 paragraph does too; the §5.2 paragraph, shortened but not emptied in round 1, is now the bare citation "Doctrine §5.2 is also relied on, for §2."; PRODUCT.md's actor sentence likewise; ruling 16's off-main provenance kept as before.
  • S6-7 — P2, PRODUCT.md cited a section that denies native clients shipped. Fixed: spec §8.4 gained a 2026-09-14 amendment recording the shipped milestone (v0.1.0 at 9225ec2) and the browser-approval handoff (86ed9f3); PRODUCT.md's two native-client citations now point at that amendment.
  • S6-8 — P2, the shipped same-network sentence was missing from the README. Fixed: the relay paragraph now quotes join.html's floor sentence verbatim.
  • S6-9 — P2, the route inventory undercounted confirmation pairs. Fixed: PRODUCT.md now says "five destructive confirmation pairs"; spec §9 now says "every confirm page (five)".
  • S6-10 — P3, Share's legacy behavior was omitted. Fixed: README now distinguishes a legacy meeting's first Share (mints a new recoverable invitation alongside the old one) from every retrieval after.
  • S6-11 — P3, "60 requests a minute" obscured the permitted burst. Fixed: README and PRODUCT.md now say "one request a second sustained, with a burst of 60".
  • S6-12 — P2, the canary creation command relied on undocumented app/account defaults. Fixed: README's instances create now carries --app meet --account oficina and states the named environment bundle must already exist, created separately.
  • S6-13 — P3, disposition coverage and external-state attribution were incomplete. Fixed, then completed in Codex round 2 (S6-17): README and PRODUCT.md link to spec §15.18 as the disposition of record; the platform-124, no-Estilo-tag and credits-branch-canary claims are attributed to dated records. Round 1 left the production-promotion state itself (edge's served commit, the queued work) asserted as current fact in §15.18 and this record's own §3; both now attribute it to what carlos channels and oficina/meet discussions 11 and 14 showed on 2026-09-14, keeping "this slice changes documentation only" as the one claim checkable from the repository.

Codex round 2 (independent, static, scope 2a6eee4): verdict request changes — four findings, S6-14 through S6-17, against round 1's own fixes; the other twelve confirmed fixed as claimed (table in the round's own report). All four applied in one commit (.superpowers/sdd/2026-09-14-meet-slice-6-deploy/fix-wave-report.md, round-2 section):

  • S6-14 — P2, PRODUCT.md still claimed the native cgo bridge never ships. Fixed: "three things run under CGO_ENABLED=1, none of them shipped" is now two — make race and make native-test's callscore sub-step, both test-only — with the native Mac and iPhone/iPad apps named separately as the one place real cgo does ship (MeetBridge, a native/apple/Package.swift binary target MeetKit links, built by native/scripts/build-mac.sh), while server releases stay CGO_ENABLED=0. This record's own S6-4 line is corrected to match.
  • S6-15 — P2, the guest-grant sentence was shortened, not removed. Fixed: "Doctrine §5.2 is also relied on, for §2: a guest grant is stored, not asked for" drops its second clause — still a paraphrase of doctrine §5.2's grant authority — leaving the bare citation "Doctrine §5.2 is also relied on, for §2."
  • S6-16 — P2, the widened scriptless exception left AGENTS.md behind. Fixed: AGENTS.md's two scriptless lines (the "Screens work with JavaScript disabled" rule and the UX-conventions sentence) now name the chat panel and admission controls alongside browser media participation, matching §9, README and PRODUCT.md; §9's own "the binding file and the code agree" is corrected to say when each half landed; §15.18 records the correction.
  • S6-17 — P3, production state was asserted as current rather than attributed. Fixed: §15.18's production-promotion bullet and this record's own §1 and §3 now attribute edge's served commit and the queued web UI work to what carlos channels and oficina/meet discussions 11 and 14 showed on 2026-09-14, rather than presenting it as established from this repository; "this slice changes documentation only" stays stated as fact, since the diff itself proves it.

Codex round 3 (independent, static, scope cd02a59): verdict accept — S6-14 to S6-17 closed, no new finding, "fit to merge as documentation of the code on this branch". Three rounds in all: 13, 4, 0 findings.

---

3. Carried items, and where they go

  • The acknowledgements page. Discussion 10's branch feat-open-source-credits, not yet on main. Destination: that branch's owner; when it merges, the README's "Where things are written down" section should gain the credits page's path (one line).
  • The Estilo theme tag. No tagged release exists; the pseudo-version pin stays until one does. Destination: oficina/estilo.
  • The production promotion of main's head. As observed on 2026-09-14 from carlos channels and oficina/meet discussions 11 and 14, edge was serving 651cff2 with discussion 14's web UI work queued behind it — state as of that observation, not asserted as current here. Main is at 9225ec2 plus this slice, checkable from this repository: 9225ec2 changed native code only, and this slice changes documents only. Destination: Paul, who promotes by hand.
  • Unauthenticated flood control on /api/v1 (from slice 5). Destination: carlos/platform, unchanged.
  • Platform discussion 124 (carlos canary and the one-label host). Open. The README carries the recipe that works. Destination: carlos/platform.
  • Spec §9's "four confirm pages" is five (remove, takeover, replace-link, end, revoke-agent). Resolved in Codex round 1 (S6-9): §9 now says "every confirm page (five)" and PRODUCT.md says "five destructive confirmation pairs".
  • Copy catalogue (copy review waived): the README's and PRODUCT.md's prose are the new user-facing text this slice adds; neither is an app string. Nothing in internal/calls/templates changed.
  • The ledger's process note. A writer's flag should become a task, not a paragraph: two of the three task reports flagged the right problems (W6-3, W6-6) in their "not corrected" sections and the controller took them as recorded rather than as work.

---

4. Deploying this slice

Nothing to deploy. No binary, migration, template, client or configuration changed. When main is next promoted, the README's Deploying section is the recipe, and the carlos deploy wait note in §1 applies.

---

5. The gates, and how to run them

| Gate | Command | This slice | |---|---|---| | CI | CGO_ENABLED=0 make ci | Green on every commit of the branch; remote CI passed on e684b97 and c22cae7. Markdown cannot fail it; it is run so the branch's head is known green. | | Race | make race | Not run: no change under internal/calls/hub or the stream. | | Browser | make browser (sandbox off) | Not run: no page, template or client file changed. The last run on a shipping head is slice 5's, 31 of 31 on 4f896c2. | | Native | make native-test | Not run: nothing under native/, callscore/ or protocol/ changed. |