After round 5 (`CODEX-REVIEW-HOSTFILES-CAP-5.md`), Paul ruled that no over-cap entry is exempt. Every attempt to tolerate one in the readers opened a new edge.
4
5
The branch now differs from main (f97898f1) only by:
6
- the exported `hostfiles.RestorableWithinCap(m) error`, which is `manifestWithinCap`: every entry, live, tombstoned or skipped, within the cap;
7
- its test;
8
- an envelope-only Plan 14 overlay.
9
10
Readers, writers, Restore and the scan are main's, byte for byte.
11
12
**Judge:**
13
1. Does the diff against main contain anything beyond that?
14
2. Is RestorableWithinCap exactly the rule every reader applies, so that a manifest passing it can't be refused by checkManifest for the cap?
15
3. Is the census overlay correct (envelope-only, legacy seal unchanged)?
16
4. **Verdict:** is it ready to merge?
17
18
Give findings P1/P2/P3 with file:line. Read-only; run nothing heavy.
amadan