| 1 | Reviewed `64a0a793`. |
| 2 | |
| 3 | | Round 1 finding | Disposition | Assessment | |
| 4 | |---|---|---| |
| 5 | | 1. One-box create recovery | Resolved | Baseline selection and cancellation behavior are preserved; interruption and seed-trace comparisons are added. | |
| 6 | | 2. Stuck source admissions | Resolved | Both admission paths refuse stuck operations; a targeted wake test covers the source. | |
| 7 | | 3. Sole-box eligibility | Resolved | The shortcut is restricted to the original non-HA shape. Five HA eligibility refusals are tested. | |
| 8 | | 4. Acknowledgement fidelity | Resolved for the reported defects | Durable acknowledgements replace current leases, and the missing installed/probing barriers are added. A separate failover barrier is still missing below. | |
| 9 | | 5. Fence timing | Resolved | Retained observation times govern pin delays and dead-target deadlines, with targeted tests. | |
| 10 | | 6. Exact-phase termination | Resolved | The matrix asserts the exact phase and live topology before injection and includes target loss in `probe-failed`. | |
| 11 | | 7. Mutation-sensitive evidence | Resolved in the plan | All five guards now have discriminating direct tests. | |
| 12 | | 8. Claim §11 coverage | **Partly resolved** | The move, record-race and cleanup cases are added. The [crash test](/home/paulca/amadan.net/carlos/platform/.claude/worktrees/region-ha-two-box/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-07-region-ha-hostlife-two-box.md:6704) still misses **marker published, replication not yet open**: it holds the marker PUT before publication or waits until replication has opened. Add an explicit yield at the intervening boundary and crash there. | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | The coverage table’s remaining mappings to 1b-next adapter tests are acceptable under claim §11. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | 1. **P2 — Tasks 2–3, Step 1: failover selects its pin before the required acknowledgement.** |
| 17 | [`startFailover`](/home/paulca/amadan.net/carlos/platform/.claude/worktrees/region-ha-two-box/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-07-region-ha-hostlife-two-box.md:2866) enters `pinning` without a target. [`relocPinning`](/home/paulca/amadan.net/carlos/platform/.claude/worktrees/region-ha-two-box/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-07-region-ha-hostlife-two-box.md:1563) journals the pin before naming a target or checking acknowledgements. Accepted 1b-next rev 19’s `PinFailover` instead requires participant acknowledgements before entering `pinning`. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Hold the target controller unavailable and land a newer files manifest during that delay: the model can already have frozen an earlier pin, while 1b-next must wait. Ruling 4’s phase collapse therefore moves a guard, and removing production’s `PinFailover` barrier has no model counterpart. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | **Fix:** preserve failover `starting`, or an equivalent guard before pin selection. Add a test that delays acknowledgement while a newer manifest lands. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | 2. **P2 — Task 5, Step 1: the two-box adverse-volume test does not prove execution recovery.** |
| 24 | [`TestL18AdverseVolume`](/home/paulca/amadan.net/carlos/platform/.claude/worktrees/region-ha-two-box/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-07-region-ha-hostlife-two-box.md:4193) completes a drain before terminating the former executor. It verifies retained local chores, but the current executor never fails. Claim §11 requires recovery to proceed while those chores remain open; the one-box case alone does not establish this in both shapes. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | **Fix:** terminate the current executor with `DeleteOnTermination=false`, await serving on its peer, and assert the dead box’s local chore remains open before operator cleanup runs. |
| 27 | |
| 28 | Sequential patches and Go parsing were checked in memory. Compilation, runtime tests and mutation results were not independently reproduced in this read-only workspace. No files changed or sweeps ran. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | --- |
| 31 | |
| 32 | **FIRST PROMPT:** |
| 33 | Review the plan at `64a0a793` using review brief 2. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | **WHAT:** |
| 36 | Check prior dispositions and report new findings. |
| 37 | |
| 38 | **STATUS:** |
| 39 | Seven resolved, one partly resolved; two new P2 findings. |
| 40 | |
| 41 | **NEEDED:** |
| 42 | Nothing for this review. |
| 43 | |
| 44 | **RECOMMENDED:** |
| 45 | Correct the failover barrier and complete the adverse-volume and crash-boundary tests. |
| 46 | |
| 47 | **SESSION:** |
| 48 | Safe to close — no files changed or processes left running. |
| 49 | |
| 50 | **Verdict: not ready.** |
amadan