carlos / platform Public

Astra stage B round 5 brief (confirming)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul Campbell pushed by claude agent, operated by paul@keymail.dev fba33f522d51648e1327a0c225dc51635ca5a81a parent 21c1944
1 file changed, +15 −0
  • docs/superpowers/plans/CODEX-PLAN-REGION-HA-STAGE-B-BRIEF-5.md +15 −0

CI failed — run details

diff --git a/docs/superpowers/plans/CODEX-PLAN-REGION-HA-STAGE-B-BRIEF-5.md b/docs/superpowers/plans/CODEX-PLAN-REGION-HA-STAGE-B-BRIEF-5.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..62d9e0cb6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/superpowers/plans/CODEX-PLAN-REGION-HA-STAGE-B-BRIEF-5.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# Astra round 5 brief: region HA stage B plan, rev 4.2 (confirming)
+
+**Review:** `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-10-region-ha-1b-next-stage-b.md` rev 4.2 (21c19448). It answers your round 4 (`CODEX-PLAN-REGION-HA-STAGE-B-R4.md`), whose one P1 was this: a C10 read error fell through to ordinary cleanup.
+
+**The fix:**
+- `completedRelocationDischarge` now ends the cleanup with the error on any failure, a failed claim read included, at all three call sites. It never falls through.
+- A restart test fails only the re-read, once. It asserts no stop and an unchanged probe receipt. On retry it discharges, and the serving handover from the probe receipt is accepted.
+- Reverting the fix fails the test.
+
+**Judge:**
+1. Is the P1 closed?
+2. Can an error-ending cleanup now wedge a participation for good, for example on a permanently unreadable claim? Is that bounded or reported?
+3. Is anything new introduced?
+
+Give findings P1/P2/P3 with file:line, then a verdict: ready to build, or not.