amadan
Region HA two-box model plan: Astra round 9, ready to build
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 file changed,
+38
−0
docs/superpowers/plans/CODEX-PLAN-REGION-HA-TWO-BOX-R9.md+38 −0
CI passed — run details
diff --git a/docs/superpowers/plans/CODEX-PLAN-REGION-HA-TWO-BOX-R9.md b/docs/superpowers/plans/CODEX-PLAN-REGION-HA-TWO-BOX-R9.md| new file mode 100644 |
| index 000000000..aca59786d |
| --- /dev/null |
| +++ b/docs/superpowers/plans/CODEX-PLAN-REGION-HA-TWO-BOX-R9.md |
| @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ |
| +Reviewed `1a8ccd44`. |
| + |
| +| Round 8 finding | Disposition | Assessment | |
| +|---|---|---| |
| +| #1: recorded positions incorrectly suffice after a controller crash | Resolved | Task 5H separates positions from the durable receipt and records the flushing controller. Same-controller completion and post-restart replay now match 1b-next. Tests cover crashes before and after receipt persistence; the operator predicate uses the same distinction. | |
| +| #2: identity traces omit seed 300 | Resolved | Task 1’s identity loop now covers `1..n`, matching the gate. | |
| + |
| +**No new P1/P2/P3 findings.** |
| + |
| +The L18 and claim §11 coverage mappings hold, including the one-box region scenarios, exact termination phases, adverse-volume recovery, and installation boundaries. The entry-point ordering matches 1b-next within the stated abstractions. The receipt mutation’s expected miss is justified: its incorrect progress requires direct assertions rather than the existing safety invariants. |
| + |
| +The model still cannot catch the adapter concerns listed in the [coverage table](/home/paulca/amadan.net/carlos/platform/.claude/worktrees/region-ha-two-box/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-07-region-ha-hostlife-two-box.md:229): location-lease enforcement, durable loss-evidence retention, discovery completion, full controller lifecycle, production wiring and privileges, HA-disabled reconciliation, and environment-file deletion. Those retain their 1b-next test obligations. R19 adds no findings. |
| + |
| +The model’s immediate parking of the pinned manifest remains an explicit abstraction: 1b-next completion queues local cleanup and abandoned prepared generations; obsolete manifests belong to the at-rest sweep. |
| + |
| +Task 1 was reconstructed in memory. All 13 subsequent patches—231 hunks—applied sequentially. Go parsing/formatting, shell syntax, and rule counts checked cleanly: 162 rules, including 54 region HA rules. Compilation, runtime tests, mutations, and identity comparisons were **not independently reproduced** in this read-only workspace. |
| + |
| +--- |
| + |
| +**FIRST PROMPT:** |
| +“Follow the review brief docs/superpowers/plans/CODEX-PLAN-REGION-HA-TWO-BOX-BRIEF-9.md. Review the plan at commit 1a8ccd44.” |
| + |
| +**WHAT:** |
| +Review round 8’s dispositions and report new findings. |
| + |
| +**STATUS:** |
| +Both findings resolved; no new findings. |
| + |
| +**NEEDED:** |
| +Nothing for this review. |
| + |
| +**RECOMMENDED:** |
| +Build the plan in order and retain the joint-round merge gate. |
| + |
| +**SESSION:** |
| +Safe to close — no files changed or processes left running. |
| + |
| +**Verdict: ready to build.** |
| \ No newline at end of file |