carlos / platform Public

docs: rails-poc spec §7 — link the filed platform issues (#152, #153)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul Campbell pushed by paul@keymail.dev 13d7f5772b2bab697f3cd0965111fbbd3630b0d1 parent d98c776
1 file changed, +5 −4
  • docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-11-rails-behind-carlos-edge-poc-design.md +5 −4
diff --git a/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-11-rails-behind-carlos-edge-poc-design.md b/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-11-rails-behind-carlos-edge-poc-design.md
index 7408f692c..04eacc6e6 100644
--- a/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-11-rails-behind-carlos-edge-poc-design.md
+++ b/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-11-rails-behind-carlos-edge-poc-design.md
@@ -221,10 +221,11 @@ the migration evaluation:
- **CARLOS concerns** (roadmap candidates, priced by whether
Rails-on-CARLOS graduates from migration tactic to product):
multi-upstream health-checked `addr` routes at the edge — the
- platform-native replacement for the NLB rung; and the edge's own HA
- posture (standby/EIP failover), which is a whole-deployment question
- every CARLOS tenant shares — the Rails apps widen the blast radius of
- a risk `go.tito.io` already carries, they don't create it.
+ platform-native replacement for the NLB rung (filed as platform
+ #152); and the edge's own HA posture (standby/EIP failover), which
+ is a whole-deployment question every CARLOS tenant shares — the
+ Rails apps widen the blast radius of a risk `go.tito.io` already
+ carries, they don't create it (filed as platform #153).
- Data HA is out of scope by construction: Postgres/MySQL/Valkey/
Memcached stay in RDS/Elasticache with their own multi-AZ story —
the apps' state was never on k8s, so the migration never touches the