carlos / movement Public

The headline question is answered, so the spec should stop asking it

Paul settled it during PRODUCT.md capture: both subjects, and the tension
is the message. What is left is a factual constraint, not a strategic
choice, so it moves out of Open.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul Campbell d40fd32a54fe578e65fa83820d79976cdf232174 parent aa59645
1 file changed, +8 −5
  • docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-01-movement-design.md +8 −5
diff --git a/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-01-movement-design.md b/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-01-movement-design.md
index d00bd35..e2ae7a9 100644
--- a/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-01-movement-design.md
+++ b/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-01-movement-design.md
@@ -706,11 +706,14 @@ reach production.
signal this app exists to isolate. The label needs to be something that
group would own willingly, with the diagnosis living in Paul's reading of
the bucket rather than in the words on the button. Settled at copy review.
-- **The headline against carlosframework.com.** The proposed line frames
- CARLOS as simplifying how we build connected software; the site sells cost,
- security, resilience, privacy and sovereignty, with per-person encrypted
- databases. A visitor who follows the link meets a different pitch. Settled
- at copy review.
+- ~~**The headline against carlosframework.com.**~~ **Settled by Paul,
+ 2026-09-01, during `PRODUCT.md` capture:** the page is about both CARLOS and
+ the ethics, and says so — the tension between them is the message, not a
+ problem to resolve in favour of one. The remaining constraint is factual
+ rather than strategic: carlosframework.com leads with cost, security,
+ resilience, privacy and sovereignty, so nothing here may describe CARLOS in
+ terms that page would contradict. `PRODUCT.md` §Positioning is now the
+ authority; copy review writes to it rather than deciding it.
- **Ruling 21 costs Paul something.** Pending rows carry the free-text note,
and hiding them means not reading what someone wrote until they confirm. If
that is the wrong trade, ruling 21 is the row to revise — but it should be