The headline question is answered, so the spec should stop asking it
Paul settled it during PRODUCT.md capture: both subjects, and the tension is the message. What is left is a factual constraint, not a strategic choice, so it moves out of Open.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 file changed,
+8
−5
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-01-movement-design.md+8 −5
diff --git a/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-01-movement-design.md b/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-01-movement-design.md| index d00bd35..e2ae7a9 100644 |
| --- a/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-01-movement-design.md |
| +++ b/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-09-01-movement-design.md |
| @@ -706,11 +706,14 @@ reach production. |
| signal this app exists to isolate. The label needs to be something that |
| group would own willingly, with the diagnosis living in Paul's reading of |
| the bucket rather than in the words on the button. Settled at copy review. |
| -- **The headline against carlosframework.com.** The proposed line frames |
| - CARLOS as simplifying how we build connected software; the site sells cost, |
| - security, resilience, privacy and sovereignty, with per-person encrypted |
| - databases. A visitor who follows the link meets a different pitch. Settled |
| - at copy review. |
| +- ~~**The headline against carlosframework.com.**~~ **Settled by Paul, |
| + 2026-09-01, during `PRODUCT.md` capture:** the page is about both CARLOS and |
| + the ethics, and says so — the tension between them is the message, not a |
| + problem to resolve in favour of one. The remaining constraint is factual |
| + rather than strategic: carlosframework.com leads with cost, security, |
| + resilience, privacy and sovereignty, so nothing here may describe CARLOS in |
| + terms that page would contradict. `PRODUCT.md` §Positioning is now the |
| + authority; copy review writes to it rather than deciding it. |
| - **Ruling 21 costs Paul something.** Pending rows carry the free-text note, |
| and hiding them means not reading what someone wrote until they confirm. If |
| that is the wrong trade, ruling 21 is the row to revise — but it should be |